Contact Us
|
Positive Steps for Screening Out Workplace Violence
There are no perfect solutions for ending workplace violence
called an epidemic by the Centers for Disease Control but one
California company has designed and implemented a screening program
that comes close.
Jurg (Bill) Mattman of The Mattman Company is a leading expert in employee and executive security, and a principal founder of the Workplace Violence Research Institute. Last spring, The Mattman Company was asked by a computer software company in Santa Ana, Calif., to develop an effective screening program that would not only address the violence issue but legal concerns as well.
Application Process
Mattman developed an extensive screening process for the software
company, designed to root out potential "problem employees."
Step one is to tell applicants that everybody is subject to random
drug testing and a background investigation.
Once the application is received, the software company verifies
education, job positions and titles, and especially employment dates.
"The reason is that people who have weak job histories, lots of
job changes, know that employers don’t like that and they will drop
off half the jobs and just expand the time period," Mattman says.
"If you have somebody hiding a specific job, it could be that
something happened at one location that they don’t want you to know about.
In any case, if you have a new employee who lies to you at the start,
you should be worried. It’s likely that they will become a problem
in some form or another."
Concurrently with the verifications, The Mattman Company performs a
credit check, criminal background check, DMV check and public filing
check on the software company’s applicants.
The last item, Mattman says, is to "check carefully with
references." He recommends asking for another name of someone
who knows the applicant. Then, "disregard all the information
from the first two levels. Start paying attention at the third level."
20 Questions
Another vital part of the hiring process is the applicant interview.
Mattman gave the software company a list of about 20
"open-ended" questions, though not all of them need to be
asked in every interview.
For example, Mattman says, "you might ask, ‘tell me about the
best boss you’ve ever had?’ That leaves a lot of room for comment.
The next question, ‘tell me about the worst boss?’ One indicator of
potential problems is the person who has never had a good boss."
The software company also has two people interview the applicant, one
of whom is a security officer.
Rules and Consequences
The process does not end with the hiring, Mattman says. The new
employee must be familiarized with company rules and regulations
and the consequences of not following them.
These rules and procedures have had an additional benefit for the
software company, Mattman says. "They have told me that they
feel very comfortable with this, and have a better handle on personnel.
But the primary thing is that their labor law firm was extremely
pleased to see they are doing it. It goes a long way to reducing
liability."
Though the program was designed for one company, Mattman feels it
is applicable generally. "It’s kind of like bringing the
level of safety up to 100 percent. That may not be possible, but
I feel that by asking them to implement this program we have
narrowed the gap to maybe 98 percent."
"I do not think this is a perfect program. But it is a
realistic program that can be applied to most companies without
incurring outrageous costs."
Home | Back to Top Contact Us | Who We Are | Services References | Resource Materials | Articles © 2012 Workplace Violence Research Institute All rights reserved. Do not duplicate or redistribute in any form. |